"TAKE HEED THAT NO MAN DECEIVE YOU!"
(The primary warning of Jesus Christ concerning the Last Days, as recorded in Matthew 24:4)
PREAMBLE
The more I've researched the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, the more apparent it has become to me how heavily suspect it is, and how incredibly irresponsible the Government has been in allowing its roll-out across the UK. The propaganda being endlessly pumped out just proves how undemocratic our society has so rapidly become, where only the official narrative is to be told, and any challenge to it is to be crushed beneath a heel of cold steel! Tyranny has triumphed over freedom, and the vaccine, not the Son of God, is being everywhere hailed as our saviour! This situation is just too dreadful for words to adequately describe.
I'm very aware of the inherent risk of being censored, or even completely shut down, by publicly asking questions that "the-powers-that-be" do NOT want to be asked, and sharing information that "they" do NOT want to be shared. But the bottom line for me is, as it ever must be, what is the Lord's will? I conclude that in this, as indeed in all things, His will is that the truth be told. And if the watchman sees the danger, but gives not the warning, he is accountable before God for his wretched silence.
THE COMPANY
Hype and hyperbole have characterized the production and distribution of this warp-speed vaccine; what information has been made available to the general public has been selective to say the least. Have people been made at all aware that Pfizer has an absolutely abysmal track record in its operations, which has resulted in them shelling out billions of dollars in successful lawsuits lodged against them? It really has quite some history of being utterly corrupt and unscrupulous in its dealings. News to you, huh? Consider if you will this incredible indictment of this "Big Pharma" company: "Pfizer set a record for the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine of any kind with $2.3 billion in 2009." (Source: https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturers/pfizer/ - please refer to this site for very disturbing details about Pfizer, including the 1996 scandal, when the company conducted unauthorized trials of its Trovan drug on 200 Nigerian children, resulting in 11 deaths and many more being disabled).
In 2012, the 'Financial Times' reported that Pfizer was fined $60 million by US regulators for the decade-long bribery of doctors and government officials in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. (Source: https://www.ft.com/content/216d2e3e-e0aa-11e1-b465-00144feab49a). And this is but one randomly plucked example of their misdemeanours. Since the year 2000, Pfizer has chalked up a total of no less than $4,747,652,947 in penalties, with no less than 80 records of offences that they have brazenly committed! (Source: https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizer - this site also carries much information demonstrating just how NOT above board this company is!)
So, if you might have been pondering the glaring dichotomy of the Government on the one hand gushing about how absolutely safe Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine is, when on the other, as 'The Independent' reported, it has granted the company legal indemnity from being sued by ANYONE in the event of problems - when we are assured that there are none! - well, now you know why Pfizer will have insisted on this in its UK purchase contract! You'll also now know why Pfizer UK refused to explain, saying, "We're not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses." Still trust this company enough to roll up your sleeve? (Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html)
THE PRODUCT
But there's more to be considered. Much more than just the extremely shady nature of the company that manufactures it. (Alongside BioNTech). What about the vaccine in itself? Is it really as safe as we're assured that it is?
First observation to be made in this respect is so obvious that it really shouldn't need to be made, other than for the fact that it's often the patently obvious that somehow eludes:
EVEN IF - AND THAT'S A BIG IF - THE VACCINE INDEED PROVES TO BE SAFE IN THE SHORT TERM, ABSOLUTELY NO-ONE CAN KNOW WHAT THE POSSIBLE LONG-TERM EFFECTS MIGHT PROVE TO BE. NO LAUNCH INTO THE UNKNOWN CAN POSSIBLY BE GUARANTEED TO BE SAFE; IT IS IN FACT FRAUGHT WITH DANGER!
THIS UNDERLYING, VERY VALID CONCERN IS ONLY MADE ALL THE MORE SO BY THE FACT THAT THE PFIZER/BIONTECH PRODUCT UTILIZES GENETICALLY-BASED mRNA TECHNOLOGY; IT IS A TYPE OF VACCINE WHICH HAS NEVER HITHERTO BEEN AUTHORIZED FOR USE IN HUMANS! YET AFTER ESSENTIALLY JUST SMALL-SCALE TRIALS, IT IS NOW BEING INJECTED INTO THE BODIES OF MILLIONS.
With this firmly in mind, let's turn to something reported, not as it happens in the British but in the German English language news. The former head of respiratory research at Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and the lung specialist and ex-head of Germany's public health department, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, have filed an application to the European Medicine Agency for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, particularly those conducted by BioNTech/Pfizer. Their reasons, which I consider to be of such critical importance as to reproduce them here, focus upon:
1) The formation of so-called "non-neutralizing antibodies" can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, "wild" virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
2) The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
3) The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance - this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
4) The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. (When it might be all too late! - Rob). Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020. (Of course, in its wisdom (!) the UK Government has in the meantime given its own emergency approval! - Rob). (Source: https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/)
In respect of point 2 above, I want to tie this in with an "anomaly" in the guidelines prepared for the mass vaccination programme. There are actually two different sets of information on the Pfizer vaccine issued, one for healthcare professionals, and one for recipients of said vaccine. In the one for doctors, etc., is found the bald statement, "It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility." (Source: https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf). But in the guidelines for recipients, this statement is noticeably OMITTED! How so, one must ask? Why are young women not to be informed that being vaccinated carries the risk of them not being able to have children? (For comparison, the information leaflet for recipients can be found here: https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Information_for_UK_recipients_on_Pfizer_BioNTech_COVID-19_vaccine.pdf.
COVI-PASSES... OR COVI-FAILS?
Quite apart from the all too real concerns surrounding both the company and the product, there is of course the question of whether "vaccine passports" will be issued, with all that that would entail for our cherished freedoms. And here we find another stark dichotomy from Westminster. We have James Cleverly saying a loud "Yay!" while from Michael Gove comes an equally loud "Nay!" (Wales WILL have them, by the way - please see https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/covid-vaccine-wales-id-cards-immunity-passports-b1766172.html)
Cleverly: https://uk.yahoo.com/news/covid-vaccine-card-could-mean-084843026.html
Gove: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55143484
CONCLUSION
So who and what are we to believe? Who and what can we trust in? In this whole grim situation, there are more questions than answers; there is no black and white but only varying shades of grey. Openness has had a closure notice slapped on it, and Honesty together with his partner Integrity would now seem to be on vacation in sunnier climes.
DOUBTS, DICHOTOMIES, DANGERS AND DECEIT ARE THE THINGS THAT I FOR ONE KEEP SEEING. THE MEDIA AND THE POLITICIANS PROCLAIM LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL. I FEAR THAT IT'S JUST THE OMINOUS HEADLIGHT OF AN APPROACHING THOUSAND-TON EXPRESS TRAIN!
